Why websites trust addresses from datacenters, home networks and mobile carriers differently.
Why websites care whose address it is
Every IP address has an "owner" — the organization it was issued to. Using public databases, a website can tell whether an address belongs to a datacenter, a home internet provider or a mobile carrier. That affects how much the site trusts the visitor.
Datacenter
Addresses issued to hosting companies and datacenters.
- Pros: high speed, low price, stability.
- Cons: websites recognize these addresses easily, and strict platforms are more likely to show them a captcha or limit access.
- Best for: collecting data from less strict sites, testing, tasks where speed matters.
Residential
Addresses of home internet connections.
- Pros: to websites they look like regular users, so they're trusted more.
- Cons: more expensive than datacenter, and speed depends on the specific connection.
- Best for: working with strict websites, checking search results and ads, collecting data where datacenter IPs get blocked.
Mobile
Addresses of mobile carriers.
- Pros: the highest trust. Many of a carrier's subscribers share one mobile address at the same time, so websites are careful about blocking these addresses — they'd block regular users too.
- Cons: the most expensive.
- Best for: social networks and platforms with the strictest protection.
ISP — the hybrid
ISP proxies are static addresses registered to internet providers but hosted on servers. They combine trust close to residential with the speed and stability of datacenter IPs.
How to choose
| Website | What to choose |
|---|---|
| No strict protection | Datacenter |
| Medium protection | ISP or residential |
| Social networks, strict platforms | Mobile or residential |